1. At the
very beginning of What She Knew, Rachel states that “in the eyes of others we’re
often not who we imagine ourselves to be” How much do you agree with this
statement and do you think it’s a liberating idea or an unsettling one?
2. The
narrative in What She Knew is presented in some unusual ways, including through
social media excerpts, transcripts and the alternating viewpoints of Rachel and
Jim. What did you make of this?
3. Do you
think Rachel and Jim change as the story evolves and if so, how?
4. Does
Rachel deserve the criticism that she gets via social media?
5. Do you
think that the influence of social media has a negative impact on how the case
develops for both the police and Rachel?
6. Rachel
feels that the media would have treated her differently if she hadn’t been a
single mother. Do you agree with this?
7. Do you
think it was understandable for Rachel to follow her instincts at the press
conference?
8. Does the
ending of the book work for you? Would you have like to see it resolved differently?
9. Were you
surprised when you discovered who was responsible for Ben’s abduction? Do you
think having a position of trust or authority means that people can get away
with more than they would otherwise?
10. Did you
sympathize with Jim by the end? Should he have let his instincts or personal
feelings interfere with his rational judgments about the case?
11. What is
the importance of secrets in this novel?